Anisha Lakhani's Schooled

I know this is a recurring theme amongst our class, but I was really disgusted by this narrative and the story it told.
My mom is in a way very similar to the main character. She teaches at the Lycee Francais in Manhattan, a private school that attracts Madonna's daughter and Angolina Jolie's twins. To say the least, it's pretty fancy shmancy. In order for her to make extra money, my mother tutors for the AP French exam on weekends or afternoon, an extra income which helps with two kids in college and a dog that likes to eat more than it should.

While she has of course talked about the privilege these kids have, and how she's had to numerously put "Lola" back in her place (this is what Madonna's daughter Lourdes likes to be called), she's never once blamed an entire educational system or viewed her tutoring job as being completely pointless because she does their homework. Because she doesn't.

I'm not sure what sort of world Lakhani claims exists, but it's undeniably skewed, and even offensive. Yes, I whole heartily believe that some parents believe they are titled to anything as well as their kids (my mother dreads the parent-teacher nights). But when Lakhani writes things like "I think people need to really question the validity of tutoring and its place in education today" I just want to soccer punch her. Really? She believes that there is NO VALIDITY at all in tutoring? I'd love for her to swing on by by the Writer's Center here and then say this statement out loud.

Ugh, shit like this pisses me off.

The Women of Brewster Place: Mattie Michael

Throughout Mattie Michael's story, it seems that a lot of her time is spent worrying how she pleases men. In other words, she seems to live for them. Her dad wants her to court a respectable man, and therefore she spends every Sunday with a boy she neither likes nor appreciates. Knowing how much her father dedicates himself to her, she tries to please him as much as possible.
Of course, the worst act of defiance possible toward her father is to go out with Butch. However, confronted with her need to please, or rather her dependence on men and their approval, she submits to Butch as well and lets go of her own morals. Consequence? She ends up pregnant with his child.
Once the child enters her life. She does everything for him. She moves boarding house in order for him to be raised in a more comfortable environment despite her meager income and long working hours. To her luck, she comes across Miss Eva, who lets her board in her house for free. Yet even Miss Eva warns Mattie of he dependence on her child. During a small argument, Miss Eva tells her that she should leave Basil sleep by himself at night, however Mattie refutes by saying Basil is afraid of the dark. Even though there are enough rooms so that Basil could have his own, Mattie holds on to him so much that she cannot be physically parted from him.
After Miss Eva's death, Mattie understands why Miss Eva never asked her to pay anything and made sure she was saving up money: so she could inherit the house.
However, Mattie does not think of the house as her own possession, but as her son's. Maylor writes, "It would be all for him and those to come from the long, muscular thighs of him who sat opposite her at the table" (40). Mattie therefore strips any agency she has and gives everything she has to her son.
Just as her dependence got her "in trouble" so to speak the first time around, there are further consequences this time. Her son ends up killing a man, and while it's unclear what happens to him, we can assume that he kills himself since he warned her that he'd rather shoot himself than to spend time in jail. We never see him again. Miss Eva's house, then, which she ascribed to her son, cannot be "hers" to live in, and so she departs.
In the end, she becomes the owner of "Brewster Place," finally a place she owns, and where she can carry out the kindness of Miss Eva and perhaps house people more fortunate than her in terms of the loss and the pain she experienced.

Rose of Sharon’s Pregnancy

Tom's younger sister, Rose of Sharon, begins the journey to California pregnant with her first child. She dreams of establishing a new life in the city and how she will dress her baby once she is there. In this way, she embodies the idealist views of the migrants during that time. Because she is pregnant, she also symbolizes a possible new beginning, a "rebirth" of the migrant class. But this obsession consumes her so much that she becomes condescending and adopts an attitude of superiority over others. Because she is pregnant, Rose of Sharon perhaps believes her possession is proof of her already attained new reality. For example, as the family packs the truck for California, Rose of Sharon refuses to help for fear that she might hurt her fetus.
This goes to show, however, how fragile the American Dream is. While perhaps Rose of Sharon takes advantage of her position as a pregnant woman, and identifies her baby with the symbol of the West, she is also extremely fearful of losing it, repeatedly asking her mother again and again if whatever activity she does will be harmful for her child. This intense fear of losing her baby foreshadows her still-birth. Indeed, the harsh realities hit hard after Rose of Sharon's husband leaves her, and she gives birth to a dead child.
The instilled hope at the beginning comes crashing down, and the future of the migrants appears bleak. While Rose of Sharon's pregnancy was once a symbol of new hope, it transforms into a symbol of abandoned and destroyed dreams.
Her character becomes even more fascinating by the end of the novel, however, when she is transformed into a sort of Madonna: When the family comes across a starving man and his son, Rose of Shanon gives the old man her milk. Here, she becomes the care-taker and the nurturer she never could be with her baby, and in some way redeems herself. Most importantly, however, her milk is not a symbol of the American Dream as it once did, but echoing my prior blog post, it is a unifying factor for the migrant class. Her act not only humanizes her, but also shows how a shared experience of hardship and suffering creates a sort of pact between the lower class.

"I'll Be There"

One of the most touching scenes in the novel. Feeling the pain of the death of his friend, Tom shares with his Ma' some good old words of wisdom:
"Whenever they's a fight so hungry people can eat, I'll be there. Whenever they's a cop beatin' up a guy, I'll be there... I'll be in the way guys yell when they're mad an'-I'll be in the way kids laugh when they're hungry an' they know supper's ready. An' when our folks eat the stuff they raise an' live in the houses they build-why, I'll be there."
Here, you can really hear how Tom feels unified with the rest of his social class. The working class, poor, struggling families: they are all united together because of a shared experience. In this way, the upper class, mainly depicted by banks and corporations become much less part of the human experience. They are completely dehumanized and instead associated with the immobile and the material. What I mean is, while the migrants are seen laboring the fields, moving across the land, etc...the privileged class is simply portrayed by corporations and not as a unified group. There are no human qualities attributed to them.
By contrast, Tom and the rest of the migrants, despite their suffering, really seem to be part of the "human experience."

The Valley of Ashes

For some reason I have never been a fan of The Great Gatsby. Part of this may stem from the fact that it was repeatedly taught to me in high school and college, but interestingly, those like me that are not very big fans of the book tend not to be American. I think GG epitomizes the American novel, and for an outsider almost seems too cliche or specific. What I mean is, GG is grounded in American values and ideologies, and if you have not grown with these, it is hard to identify with the book at all.

One aspect of the book that often did gain my attention, however, were the descriptions of the Valley of Ashes. I thought the descriptions to be really quite beautiful, and daunting at the same time. As Fitzgerald writes, "This is a valley of ashes--a fantastic farm where ashes grow like wheat into ridges and hills and grotesque gardens; where ashes take the forms of houses and chimneys and rising smoke and, finally, with a transcendent effort, of men who move dimly and already crumbling through the powdery air." There is something quite mesmerizing in the valley of ashes, perhaps because it seems ghost-like, surreal.

The valley serves as a stark contrast to East and West Egg, both of which are doused in luxury. In the valley of ashes, however, poverty and ruin are extremely visible, representing the social decay of America.

I find it interesting that in the description of the valley, Fitzgerald uses the second person pronoun to invoke the reader: "Occasionally a line of gray cars crawls along an invisible track, gives out a ghastly creak, and comes to rest, and immediately the ash-gray men swarm up with leaden spades and stir up an impenetrable cloud, which screens their obscure operations from your sight."
The cars here are not flashy and yellow like Gatby's and the residents are not as musical and alive. Rather, the valley seems to be a completely different pace, almost asleep. That Fitzgerald uses "you" physically places the reader there too and in this way the smoke blinds us as well. Our vision is momentarily blurred and we become implemented in the story: it is easy to see the overt wealth of the upper class, but easy to overlook those that are completely outside of it.

Gatsby's Car

As Fitzgerald describes, Gatsby's car was a ''rich cream color, bright with nickel, swollen here and there in its monstrous length with triumphant hatboxes and supper-boxes and tool-boxes, and terraced with a labyrinth of windshields that mirrored a dozen suns'' (68).

Symbolically, the mustard car is a personal representation of Gatsby himself. The excess attributes of the car, with the supper-boxes and tool-boxes etc...mirror Gatsby's own over-the-top display of material wealth and social status.

Fitzgerald adds that Gastby's car was ''labyrinth of windshields that mirrored a dozen suns.'' Undoubtedly, that it glows in the sunlight further emphasizes Gatsby's obsession in showing off his wealth, but it also creates another effect: Because it mirrors the sun, it reflects something other than itself; in other words, it fails to be its own thing because it rather imitate what is already there. Thus, Gatby's car is a material representation of his own hidden and secret identity.

That the luxurious yellow Rolls-Royce causes his downfall (because he is thought to be the one to have killed Myrtle) therefore comes as no surprise. His fake identity makes him an impostor to high society, and the costume and props he take on can only work for so long. Because the car is directly connected to his own identity, the fact that the car crashes only foreshadows Gatsby's own downfall.

Menilmontant: The street as a symbol of Lily's Obsession

That's not saying much, because streets in Paris aren't very steep. But as a kid, walking up Rue Menilmontant with shopping bags, accompanied by my mother, the trip back home wasn't always fun. The reason why I'm mentioning this street/neighborhood is because in my film class the other day, I watched a short film by Dimitri Kirsanoff which is called, lo and behold, "Menilmontant". Now, the plot does not have much to do with House of Mirth, but since I was reading the book at the same time that I was watching this film (not simultaneously, of course...) I couldn't help but see bits of Edith Wharton's novel echo some of the movie's plot.
The silent and black&white film "Menilmontant" is about two sisters who move out from the country side after their parents are mysteriously murdered. As they arrive in the city, they are amazed by the movement and the music of the city. It becomes clear that they hope to find a better future there, and that they hope to be able to enjoy themselves, perhaps in "flaneur" fashion.
However, they move to the working class neighborhood of Menilmontant where they find miniscule work. To make a longe(ish) story short, by the end of the film, the younger sister becomes pregnant with a man that her older sister is now seeing, and we see her face super-imposed over the Seine, indicating her being overwhelmed and hopeless.
What I find most symbolic here, however, and which we unfortunately never discussed in my film class, is the symbol of Menilmontant itself. Because the street is steep, one either looks up and must "climb" the street, or looks down and sees all of Paris- the eiffel tower, the cars, the people in their guises, etc...I find this relevant to Lily's obsession in staying at the top, an obsession probably tied to the fact that once on top, you may look comfortably at your surrounding and even find them beautiful. However, reaching the top is painful, and going down is much easier. Accurately, Lily'spath spirals downward quite quickly, and once there the top seems impossible to reach. The Eiffel tower is no longer in sight, and the music and the treasures of the city no longer a reality.
Of course, Paris does not appear in the House of Mirth, but I thought the metaphor that Menilmontant could provide us when thinking of our heroine to be interesting.